Kevin C

Agree. Would love to see Venables and OU struggle but that seems unlikely given team the Sooners will have this season. BV seems to have them pointed in right direction. Speaking of Top25 Football Coaches…..Will be fun to watch Sark this season go head to head against BV and Elko to try and make it a 3-peat against both coaches, start the season with Sark getting payback for last 2 losses to Day (that semi-final loss really hurt) and get his first win over Lane in Nov. is it possible Sark could go 4-0 against those 4 coaches next season? I’m thinking big f’ing YES with the team he’s put together. Hook em!! 🤘🏼🐂🧡

I’d flip Sark and DeBoer. Not sold on him being the guy at Bama, time will tell.

Graduated HS in 87 and UT class of 92. Loved the Tom Penders Runnin Horns with BMW and completely enjoyed many of the teams from 2003 to 2011 under Rick Barnes but the greatest period for College Basketball imo was the 80s into the 90s. Indiana and Bob Knight, NC and Dean Smith, Georgetown and John Thompson, Duke and Coack K, Syracuse and Jim Boeheim, Kansas and Larry Brown then Roy Williams, Michigan and the Fab 5 plus all the other incredible teams in the Big 10 from Illinois, Iowa, Purdue and Gene Keady!!! great times!!

With Muschamp now leading the defense and Sark going into 6th season, I predict this will be Sark’s best coaching year yet at Texas. He has the talent now to unload his full arsenal of creative play calling. Will it match his last year at Bama as OC? Will be fun to watch!!

Agree. Coach rankings should be based on more than most recent year but recency bias is real.

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7101958/2026/03/12/college-football-coach-rankings-stewart-mandel-2026/ Stewart Mandel and Bruce Feldman each came out with their Top 25 Coaches List for 2026. I'm a sucker for these Top25 lists, love the debate and seeing what others think. Stewart Mandel has Sark at #6. Probably about right; although, I'd take Sark over a few others in the Top 5. Thought it funny to see Bruce Feldman drop Sark down to #13, laughable to see names like Dabo Swinney, Kyle Whittingham, Mike Elko, Matt Campbell, Jeff Brohm all ranked ahead of Sark on Feldman's list, wtf? Two semi-final playoff appearances in past 3 years. 3 year aggregate record of 35-8 and finished the last 3 seasons ranked #3, #3 and #13. Pretty solid when our off year finishes at 10-3 and #13. Will be funny to see how much Sark 'rebounds' in the theoretical coach rankings after this season. What matters more than anything is that we've got a rockstar coach with a brilliant offensive mind, strong culture, great front-office, huge upgrade in defensive leadership and overall top to bottom coaching staff with high stability and consistency that is extremely rare. Love and appreciate what Sark has brought to the 40 acres, going into year 6. Much to be grateful for as we prepare for our run to the playoffs and potential national championship this season. Love the team Sark has put together and his upgrades on the coaching staff. FWIW, my Top 10 Best Coaches Currently would be..... Curious how others would rank their Top 10. 1. Kirby Smart 2. Curt Cignetti 3. Ryan Day 4. Steve Sarkisian 5. Dan Lanning 6. Marcus Freeman 7. Kalen DeBoer 8. Lane Kiffin 9. Matt Campbell 10. Mario Cristobal Hook em!!! 🤘🏽🧡🐂

Love it!! 🧡🤘🏼🐂

Love it Jeff!! Fired up to see our defensive attack this season.

Why do these kids’ “representatives” think legally binding contracts aren’t enforceable? So important for schools like Cincinnati to pursue contract enforcement aggressively.

Would love to see him land in Dallas with Cooper Flagg.

Hate seeing news like this. Self inflicted. Only 25. https://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/article/vikings-wr-rondale-moore-dies-at-25-014933769.html

After the Auburn loss in late January dropped us to 12-9, March Madness seemed unlikely. Sean Miller has our Horns trending in positive direction and I agree, a 10 seed, 9 seed or any seed, would be great/. 🐂🧡🤘🏼

Keep winning Horns! Excited for March Madness!! https://www.espn.com/espn/feature/story/_/page/bracketology/ncaa-bracketology-2026-march-madness-men-field-predictions?appsrc=sc&RuleNumber=1&consent_mode=cpra

T or F - Arch will exceed 40 total TDs (passing and rushing)

Disagree with several points in response but agree with you on #7 after thinking about it more. A&M at home is an incredible home game most years. So glad it’s back. For this upcoming year, Ohio State has potential to be our best home game.

Fully agree. Makes no sense why ND is getting special treatment. What leverage do they have? Bad enough ND has cancelled USC series and set up their schedule to be one of the easiest in the country. Their schedule next year virtually guarantees playoff seeding.

No, the rules are not the same this next year. New rules go into effect that guarantee each P4 conference champion gets into playoff AND Notre Dame is guaranteed a spot if ranked in top 12. If those rules were in effect this past season, Duke and Notre Dame would have e gotten into the playoffs. Miami would have been left out.

It goes beyond G6 and Notre Dame special treatment with AQ. Let’s use 2025 final rankings as the example for how it will work differently in 2026 with the new AQ rules. Top 5 conference champs would get in plus ND if ranked in Top 12. P4 Conference Champs were: Indiana (1), Georgia (3), Texas Tech (4), Duke (UR) plus Tulane (20) as the highest G6 conference champion. Notre Dame was ranked #11 last December so they’d get AQ as well. Who would have gotten left out? #10 Miami would have gotten left out of playoffs in 2026 in place of the three AQ teams all ranked below them. The same Miami that made it to the national championship. In the new Big 10 proposal, none of that BS can happen. It’s straight Top 23 plus top G6 (last year that would be #20 Tulane so all Top 24 are in. Much cleaner. Also I like this model it because if you lost a couple games early in season but have rebounded to play great in November, if ranked #17-24, you’ll have to win 2 big underdog games on the road to make it to the quarter finals. That’s proving it on the field. Similar to NFl playoffs

Many things I like about this model: 1) Further supports playing a big time non-conference game early and allowing teams to gel in Sept/Oct. This helps further emphasize the value of gaining experience against tough opponents and 3 losses in now way eliminates a team from contention. 2) Conf championship games have become a joke. Recognize conference champion based on regular season results. No reason to play that extra game when many other teams in playoffs do not play in conf championship. 3) Top 8 teams get a bye. Top 16 teams all get to host a home playoff game. This is a win all the way around for campus games and for Top 8 teams out of regular season. A true reward for regular season results. 4) Makes the regular season even more exciting for broader base of teams who have a real shot to prove it on the field. Every game is interesting for different reasons. 5) Financially makes sense with 12 additional games and 10 of those can be bid to competing networks (or streaming partners). 6) Eliminates special treatment for ND and diminishes impact of including non Power 4 champion. 7) Full month of December would become a better bigger version of "March Madness". This would be the best home game of the season for 16 teams in December. 2nd weekend of the month is first round. 3rd weekend of the month is second round . All 16 teams know by early December where they are playing and can plan for attendance way in advance. 8. I hate the different proposals for 16 teams with subset of teams playing first round, wacky number of byes for different teams, AQs to teams who aren't even a top 20 team potentially and too complex of a playoff format. Love this model for its symmetry, equal treatment to all teams with clear benefit to top 8 teams with bye and home field. Everyone fighting to make Top 8. Hook em!!

I also like Stephen A Smith's rant about Notre Dame getting special treatment next year in current agreement. What if Texas were ranked #11 but got knocked out of playoffs by #12 Notre Dame due to their AQ status? Current model has many issues to be remedied, including the fact that the conference championships put those teams at big disadvantage of playing extra game (especially the losers) going into the playoffs then the fact that the top seeded teams do not currently get opportunity to host a playoff game at their home campuses is crazy.

I've posted my support for this 24-team playoff model over the past year (8 home playoff games in round 1 hosted by seeds 9-16 followed by 8 playoff games hosted by first round byes, seeded 1-8) with the remainder of the playoff schedule resembling current format. Conference championship games (which have become a complete joke) go away and no team would have a crazy 3-4 week bye period in December. The Top 16 teams all host 1 playoff game at home. Love it. As usual, I expect to get blasted by others with the rationale that this expanded format somehow diminishes the regular season (suggesting, I guess, that the regular season is somehow an equitable barometer between teams like Texas who play OSU and 4 other Top 10 teams versus other teams that qualified and didn't play a single Top 10 team all season). This latest proposal seems like a big move in a constructive direction as Big 10 has moved off of their previous mandate for an obscene number of automatic qualifiers for Big 10 and SEC. It's simply the Top 23 teams seeded. Last season, the SEC would have had the most teams qualify with 7 SEC teams and 6 Big 10 followed by 5 Big 12 Teams and only 3 ACC plus ND and a G5. Put another way, each team's performance on the field sets the seeding but allows inequity in schedules to be settled through the expanded playoffs. Curious what others think. Seems destined to either move to 16 or 24, but the Big 10 now offering a way to remedy the financial loss of conference championship games (proposing 10 new playoff games get packaged and put into media bidding war) and no AQs would seem to make the 24 team model much more appealing, especially the idea that the Top 16 teams all get to host 1 home playoff game. I love that aspect to this model plus many other elements. Hook em!! https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/47917988/big-ten-eyes-24-team-cfp-no-league-championship-games

Love it! Excited for Texas baseball this spring and look forward to #BasesLoaded. Gonna be a big season. Hook em!! 🤘🏼🧡🐂

Good grief, give em the extra 1/8in and 1/2in for 6ft, lol. Excited to see what both will do in NFL, especially Taaffe after getting zero respect coming out of high school as walk-on. Grit and determination. Hook em!! 🧡🐂🤘🏼

IMG_6193.mov Fun sledding in front yard!! Dogs are loving it. 🐶🧡 🥶❄️⛄️

Damn good natty. Give both teams credit for bringing it.