SchoolColors

So we are going to roll into next year with a bad offensive line again? That sounds dumb on Sark. Will we hear again this off season how great the line has looked and them completely no show?

Unfortunate. I don’t view him as a good prospect. Looks like the average we have put out there.

Max Wright should be processed and likely flipping anyway

Early on we did, yes. But as a whole we didn’t.

Why?

I personally hope we run nothing from either Georgia game last year because it didn’t really work and won’t work with this team.

I feel like if a g6 team isn’t ranked they shouldn’t get a spot. I feel like the rules specifically state ranked where as if none this year are ranked they shouldn’t be part of the tournament

Depends on what offense we run. If we run Sarks traditional offense that’s more compact and tight you can do both effectively because it’s easier to do so. If he’s running the more spread offense that he ran vs Vandy which fits our personnel better it’s harder for teams to simulate the pressure because they can’t disguise it as well

We’re 3/4 of the way through the season. We know what this team is at this point.

It’s been pouring rain all day, they are down their top 3 wide receivers due to injury.

Why? Georgia is a really good team. I never understood why people on this site were so dismissive of them.

You absolutely nailed it!

Penn St went to conservative on offense and now playing the prevent you from winning defense.

I disagree. Quinn was excellent pre snap at adjusting to what he was seeing with the line and knowing where to go with the ball. Which meant the ball came out quickly. A QB who can get the ball out quickly and process would have made the line look less bad than they are. Arch’s problems were that he wasn’t recognizing pre or post snap where to go and was holding ball a long time and/or delivering late. And no QB will be good when they’re getting hitting within a second of the snap.

He is a walking red flag

None at this time. The offensive line and injuries have hurt the position and I’d grade him as incomplete as of now. We definitely should go to the portal for that position and try to improve it.

I think expecting a coach who is in charge of the secondary who has specialized in man to man covervage but has never been good at coaching zone coverage. I expect him to be replaced this off season. He seemed like a hire we had to make because of the Joseph and Gideon timing.

The depth we hardly use? We have a lot of good or above average WRs, we don’t have a single great WR. I am of the position that we should go all in next year with extra NIL to make a run for a national championship with a year older arch. That means every position should be on the table to improve the team.

We need to quit playing soft in the back end with our alignments. We have big physical corners and we need to get them playing closer to the LOS. This doesn’t inhibit us from playing zone either. When there is a 3rd and less than 5 we shouldn’t be 8-10 yards off the LOS. I understand bend and don’t break but when you have the opportunity to get off the field, get off the field and don’t give up an easy pass for a 1st because of your alignment. Regarding Georgia, id caution against being dismissive of their pass rush based on season results.

Texas Tech

Probably wouldn’t call holding

Correcto friendo

The most offensive success we’ve seen this year is when sark goes away from his traditional offense to more spread concept 11 personnel style. It’s no coincidence that OU, Vandy, and 4th quarters vs Florida/Miss St have been our best games outside of playing SHSU. Sark needs to continue to stay with what has worked in those instances. Reverting back to his traditional offense would be a bad coaching decision. Going to the new look we have used spreads defenses out, disallows them to blitz like they have, and makes it easier for Arch to read the defense.

She’s the player we’ve been missing