Red Five

The only reason to include OU and not Texas is "Because they went 10-2 and Texas went 9-3". Because if you're basing it on who is the better team, well, I think that was settled fairly conclusively. So if the criteria is simply wins and losses regardless of anything else, the committee should admit to that.

Leaving out the SEC runner-up because they lost in the championship game would be really dumb.

Bishop's stats from that game would make for a pretty solid season. They're basically about what Parker Livingston did this year.

I don't mean to be rude, but shut the hell up.

Do we otherwise allow live mascots still? I have no idea.

My 30 second google search tells me Wilcox played DB in college but has never coached it.

This seems very premature.

I thought Ffrench would be a starter by November. Missed it by that much.

Present company excluded, of course.

Right. Sure.

Not a TD.

I think I just saw a RB score a TD on about a 30 yard run. Is that legal in college football in the year 2025? I'm almost scared to ask... what's our longest TD run by a RB this season through seven games? I think Baxter had one for about four yards against one of the September shithooks. It might be that.

He's also not getting a raise based on what he's putting on the field this year. If that was the intention it's going to horribly backfire (I don't think that's what this is about, btw).

Just a little racist, imo.

I wonder if this is a public negotiation tactic with CDC re: hiring an OC. Either way, something has been very, very off all season. We are historically bad on offense and that is unacceptable with what we are paying our HC and OC. If this continued into next season then leaving wouldn't be Sark's choice to make.

This is insanity. Dan Neil would be our best OL by a huge margin. (btw I used to work with Dan. Nice guy. It was strange to be sitting in meetings next to Dan Neil, not too long after watching him win Super Bowls.)

Florida actually offered him the job? I was under the impression that's Kiffin's if they can get the $$ right.

So, basically the two situations are nothing alike.

Our (lack of) offense last season cost us a national championship. Well that and Bert Auburn. This year it will probably be the reason we go 7-5. What exactly would we be losing again by hiring a real OC? Camera shots of Sark staring down at his play sheet in critical situations instead of being a head coach?

He hasn't been practicing or suiting out at home games.

Texas 23 OU 17

Has he even attempted to throw a football yet? Seems like a minor piece of needed information before forming an opinion.

He's at LT for OU right? He would not have won that job here.

It would be in the sense that all of our preseason goals will be toast, six games into the season. We would have new goals, like becoming bowl eligible, and doing some potentially funny things to the aggies the day after Thanksgiving. And keeping our recruiting class intact.

We need the OL to improve by leaps and bounds. In order to get to bowl eligibility.