John Moore

Considering what major college football coaches have to deal with now and where CFB is going this seems like a deal for a competent HC.

WIT

The Coleman twins are interesting. Both have good feet. Jordan plays up and down the line and Devin is primarily OG and sometimes in an Agbo role of a jumbo package. Both tick the size box. Edit: The Ramos kid has some great flexibility

The first two QB offers are interesting contrasts in style.

Tampa, FL if anyone thought this was a different kid

Mills will be competing for a starting OG spot as a redshirt FR in 2026.

Glad someone asked. I think a Texas Top 50 would be beneficial from y'all and then maybe a top 5 board at each position as the recruiting calendar comes into focus.

Get him and figure it out later

Glad Lacey canceled. Need him to be all in sooner rather than later.

A lot of talent at WR and LB chasing limited spots

I'd like to have my QB in the class 100% bought in. I'm sure the staff feels the same. Makes you wonder how long of a leash Lacey has to flirt with other schools.

FYI the Gipson being referred to in the question was Tashaun Gipson from Kimball and Wyoming who plays for the 49ers. Pretty sure Gerry was talking about Xavier Gipson from the Jets.

@Gerry Hamilton/ @CJ Vogel do y'all have Dubose production from this season? I can't find Smithson Valley stats online.

Sark likes guys that open up certain packages (Agbo, KRob, Savion Red). Having guys that are multiple that won't tip the play because of personnel changes seems like the next evolution.

Matchup nightmare fuel for opposing defenses.

Texas hasn't recruited and developed consistently well in a long time. Losing a good chunk of talent to the Draft and not missing a beat should feel weird at first but that's where Sark seemingly has us.

After suffering through years of coaches mismanaging the #s at a developmental position I'm good with them stocking the cupboard every year. We're also most likely to have 4 or 5 scholarships open up along the OLine.

I'm curious to see how much of a priority Marsh will be.

How long ago did Klein Oak install a new court?

With Anthony Williams in the fold already I suspect they're willing to go to four if it's for the right 4 names

64 does give the league, which I'll call Prestige Worldwide, a greater opportunity to make Basketball, Baseball and Olympic Sports part of the equation and potential revenue generators. A larger number, 64 in this case, would potentially allow a for complete breakaway across most, if not all, Athletic Department sports. Would the schools that are in the 48 accommodate some lesser football schools and less TV revenue from football to bring in 16 more schools that would open up TV revenue in other areas that wouldn't exist at 48? I don't think so personally based on historical decision-making but it would be my preference.

I've geeked out on this topic before. 64 teams allows for more regionality but you're splitting the pot more of course. I like 64 b/c you'll get classic rivalry games that I love between some teams that would be left out of 48. That said I'm fine with 48 as long as it happens. If they want to expand beyond 48 in the future it's always a possibility. Harder to shrink than grow. I would like to see one commissioner over the new league and equal revenue sharing from a jointly negotiated TV deal with the networks. No more looking over the fence at the neighbor's new stuff. I'd also like to see a scheduling agreement that eliminates or limits games against non-league opponents. If done correctly it could be incredibly exciting.

Very good instincts and/or coaching on play recognition and staying parallel down the line

Ran anchor a couple meets for North Crowley's 4x100 and 4x200 squad last season