51 minutes ago, qaertyisthatdude said:

He shouldn’t have to.  Banks was a unicorn plus Texas was desperate for OL back then.  Now they’re so deep guys like Fasusi and Baker can sit for a year before they play meaningful snaps.

Thats why i don’t think he happens for us. Behind the scenes he’s scared of our depth. 

On 10/23/2024 at 1:16 PM, qaertyisthatdude said:

This is why you don’t worry about recruiting until signing day.  All programs sell a vision, but at the end of the day, the games have to be played, and recruits get to see who’s real and who’s bullspitting.

That being said, I think Fasusi sticks with OU unless OU parts ways with Bedenbaugh.

Because "early playing time" on a losing team is so valuable!  🤦🏻‍♂️

🤘🏻🏈🤘🏼🏈🤘🏈🤘🏽🏈🤘🏾🏈🤘🏿

20 hours ago, Hashtag said:

Banks was day 1 starter no matter the depth. He was rare imo

More importantly, Texas really had no other choice then.

23 hours ago, NothinButDaHorns34 said:

The REAL question is if he is on kelvin banks level to come in and start as a true freshman? since it seems he’s running from our depth.  

Nah. Kelvin Banks entered college with the maturity of a 28-30 year old NFL vet … very rare IMO 

4 minutes ago, Gerry Hamilton said:

Nah. Kelvin Banks entered college with the maturity of a 28-30 year old NFL vet … very rare IMO 

His freshman performance against Will Anderson was incredible 

1 hour ago, JMarquette said:

His freshman performance against Will Anderson was incredible 

FOUR first round edges he faced his TRUE freshman season and gave up ZERO sacks which is why i don’t understand the idiots saying “there goes his first round pick hopes” after ONE sack he gave up that was mostly quinn’s fault for of course not stepping up in the pocket.